Jump to content
MrsSurvival Discussion Forums

Sarah

Users2
  • Posts

    420
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by Sarah

  1. testboth could not be sent to my classic Kindle. The email indicates that it could work on more recent Kindles. This is what it said:

     

     

     

    The following document, sent at 09:05 PM on Sun, Mar 10, 2013 GMT could not be delivered to the Kindle you specified:

    * testboth.pdf

     

    The Kindle Personal Document Service can convert and deliver the following types of documents:

    Microsoft Word (.doc, .docx)

    Rich Text Format (.rtf)

    HTML (.htm, .html)

    Text (.txt) documents

    Archived documents (zip , x-zip) and compressed archived documents

    Mobi book

     

    Images that are of type JPEGs (.jpg), GIFs (.gif), Bitmaps (.bmp), and PNG images (.png).

    Adobe PDF (.pdf) documents are delivered without conversion to Kindle DX, Second Generation and Latest Generation Kindles.

     

    Adobe PDF (.pdf) can be converted to Kindle format and delivered on an experimental basis.

     

    If the document that failed belonged to one of the above document types, please ensure the document is not password protected or encrypted. Note that the Latest Generation Kindles support password protected PDFs.

     

    Both of the other files come through, but they're completely garbled.

     

    Umm... I need a clarification on this.

     

    Testno should have come through with no issues.

    Testyes is what we are testing, but should acted as testno, 'transparent'.

    Testboth, depending on the software, should have been 1) transferable, but not openable without password, or 2) not transferable without the password. So your message would be correct.

     

    But testno and testyes were 'garbled'? Is it a garbled text or a garbled graphic issue? These are graphic pdfs, i.e. each page a jpg, with ocr text underlay. The underlay is for folks who want to use the pdf internal search/find function, but it is a very poor ocr, and is not normally done for pdf, for size reasons. If it is text and garbled, then the reader is grabbing the text in preference to the graphics, which it should not be doing.

     

    If this is the case, then we would have to discontinue the text underlay, which will limit some of the functionabity we are looking for, but survivable. Barely. (And it makes me wonder why the readers would be so crippled.)

     

    If it is a garbled graphic issue, then we are back to square one, and Adobe is confused, again.

     

    Again, Thanks for the trials!

     

    Sarah

    of the Librum

     

    PS: That bit about archived documents is not true 'across the boards'. If a zip is encrypted, and/both/or passworded, it will fail, per Adobe forums, which is why we did not 'go there'. Yes, zip has 'DRM' after a fashion.

  2. Same thing happens to me when I go to the library and sit in front of a microfilm machine to find old obituaries (for my family tree). Going through the old newspapers, I start reading articles and then looking at the ads...especially seeing the cost of stuff from years ago.

    argue1.gif

     

    We have two students working with the old county newspaper on 35 mm film, trying to rig a system to scan them. We have readers and scanners, but they have to make one, as part of the course. These two are a real comedy. Both of them fight like an old couple. So we hear arguements interspaced with dead silences (when they get trapped in the material). We get a lot of grins from other patrons over their antics.

     

    Sarah

    of the Librum

  3. That would be fantastic!

     

    Let me throw something together...

     

    http://www.librum.us/stacks/testno.pdf

    wide open pdf.

     

    http://www.librum.us/stacks/testyes.pdf

    with admin password. Should be invisible to you.

     

    http://www.librum.us/stacks/testboth.pdf

    and for s/g, both passwords, both to open (DRM) and admin. to open password is the filename.

     

    Now... Lets see if I typed those right...

     

    Yes, all three links good, first and second came up in browser with no issues, third demanded password, which took.

     

    Thanks for the offer!

     

    Sarah

  4. Philbe,

     

    Umm... Maybe. If a password is required to open, then it is DRM. If no password, and no 'machine id' or 'network id', it is not DRM.

     

    That is exactly what the 'author' password is supposed to do, and does under a PC, or MAC, a password is not required to open or use. But under a reader?

     

    Perhaps if I created a small one, and asked you folks to grab and test on your readers?

     

    Sarah

    of the Librum.

  5. Ambergris,

     

    DRM is a fuzzy thing at times. (For others: DRM: Digital Rights Management.)

     

    DRM restricts >USE< of a work. The Adobe 'to open' password is DRM. There are various other types of DRM. 'check out period', 'lease', copy protection, machine lock-ons, DRM servers, etc. Most ePub standards have competing types of DRM. FYI: most, if not all, of the ePub ones can be broken using Sabre and add-ons.

     

    No, we do not want to restrict the use, sharing, copying, etc. We do wish to protect the content from easy modification (and theft from such as Google, Internet Archive, Hathir, etc)(yes, they have and do!). On a normal PC the 'author' passworded PDF restricts modification of the work, not the use, and is 'transparent' to the user.

     

    I am thinking it would be 'transparent' to the other various PDF reader users, but do not know.

     

    Sarah

    of the Librum

  6. We are looking at revamping our Librum offerings.

     

    I know most, if not all ebook readers can use 'open' PDF files. What I need to know is can they also use 'author' or 'permissions' passworded PDFs? No, I am not talking of a password to open a PDF.

     

    Seriously, I do not know, nor do I have such a device to test on.

     

    Considering the number of folks here who do the ebooks, I thought this was a good place to ask.

     

    Sarah

    of the Librum

  7. My first reaction was 'why would you want to?'. Weight? Simply put in the vac pack if you do not want the can.

     

    It certainly not a 'back pack' food, as you have to boil water to rehydrate.

     

    Putting in the dehydrator could induce a lot of no-see-ums. Which is why we do not dehydrate.

     

    Sarah

    of the Librum

  8. Philbe,

     

    You just pushed another of my buttons. We at the Librum have been in negotiation with the family of Kurt Saxon for some time to obtain the rights to his works. Mr Saxon is now in a home, and his books/disks are out of publishment. If you can overlook his politics, he has some great material in there.

     

    Let me do a quickie... My hidden index says...<ding!>...Thermos cookery “Cooking Tools”, S1 pg 210. Translation is: 'Thermos cooking' is in 'Cooking Tools' article, in Survivor Volume 1, page 210.

     

    So, if you can find a copy of his 'Survivor' volume one, go for it!

     

    Sarah

    of the Librum.

  9. Coffee Jelly? My husband loves a strong coffee flavor in sweets. Would I make this like jams or like a jello?

     

    Yes. To both.

     

    The trick is to concentrate the coffee without burning, or allowing to get bitter.

     

    To concentrate, we use a small stove top still, low/simmer heat. Do *NOT* boil. Reduce to one quarter, by volume.

     

    For bitterness, take eggshells, lightly roasted (removes the oil), and crush. These will settle the grounds and absorb bitterness in settling. Crushed is the key, to maximise surface contact. About a half teaspoon per cup of concentrated coffee . Some folks swear on brown over white shells, but I never noticed any difference.

     

    Some folks also do a charcoal drip, to counter bitterness, but I never have.

     

    I have made both jellies (think 'gummies') and hard candies from this concentrate.

     

    I am also aware of a 'pill'. If you have seen the pressed pellet snuff, like 'Stonewall', then you know of which I speak. I do not have the recipe, or remember exactly how mine mother made the 'carrier' from grits, sorry. Mine Father would grab a few each morning before going out into the fields.

     

    Got a solder family member? These pills are always part of our 'care' packages to ours. And we usually toss in a pack of 'Stonewall' to placate his 'brothers-in-arms', usually the 'Java' flavor.

     

    And an additional tip, the 'coffee' artificial flavors are a witches brew. If it were my man, I would wean him off, in favor of mine.

     

    Sarah

    of the Librum.

  10. I missread / missintrepeted the title. But I think my tidbit will kick in...

     

    There are twenty seven different types of rice, per the Farmers Cyclopedia of Agriculture, 1911. But considering the age of that classic, there are probably more now.

     

    But you were asking about prepared, not species. Sorry.

     

    Is 'dehydrated' available in your English stores?

     

    For long term storage of the rice itself, dry full grain. If in a prepared 'dry' recipe (soup mix, ramien, 'Uncle Bens', etc) dehydrated. In a 'wet' recipe, I do not think it makes a difference. If a wet recipe, I usually use full grain, which takes longer to cook, but more wholesome.

     

    Sarah

    of the Librum

  11. Jeepers: Ah, good.

     

    Mt_Rider: Sorry about the initials, etc. We also have disabled folks with mobility issues, so I am very sympathic.

     

    I am glad you folks are able to get what you want/need, truely I am.

     

    As a librarian, when I hear of somebody who can not get what they want/need, well, it hurts..

     

     

    Sarah

    of the Librum.

  12. Jeepers,

     

    Let me try again. There is NO reason for you to visit your brick-and-mortar library to get any electronic media.

     

    Let me walk you through a late ILL request I recieved to see how it works here. Any books by George Herman Ruth? Yes. There were four. 'Babe Ruths Own Book of Baseball', 'A Long Fly', the autobiography, and one other. The first three are on our shelves. The requesting library gave me the contact email of the Patron, and that he was running Windows 7. So I replied direct to the Patron that 1) 'Babe Ruths Own Book of Baseball' is in the paperback shelf, and gave the link to the 'shelf'. 2) 'A Long Fly' is a FB standard, and give the link to the sixty day editon. I also noted that there is a full version available for download for a modest $5. (MUCH less than a physical ILL!) 3) The autobiography is not digitized, and in reserve status so no physical ILL was possible. If the Patron wishes an electronic edition would they mind a modest investment, approximately $40, to have the work done, and thereby support a student? The Patron grabbed the #1, downloaded the FB 60 day copy of #2, then purchased the unlimited (via public access portion of the portal), and then hosted the student to do the #3 work. The work was finished in three days, into a DRM FB edition, locked to the Patron (he paid for it!), and sent to the Patron for $32 (and may appear as a download FB).

     

    Had the Patron not been using Windows 7, I would have forwarded the request to the Library of Virginia to do any conversions, such as to Kindle DRM.

     

    If your library does not do kindle, have them refer to one that does. We libraries are required to have portals and to support one another. Oh, and I misstyped, add in 'using Dewey and/or OCLC'.. Any library in a ILL network >and any library using Dewey and/or OCLC< is required to portal.

     

     

     

     

    OK, let me bounce this question off you folks who 'kindle'.

     

    Kindle uses one DRM, Adobe another, etc. I think there is something like a half dozen of the DRMs.

     

    But these DRMs are limited, intentionally made so they can be defeated/bypassed. Federal regulations require this. The exception is the FB standard, which was government created. LOCER is another, but nobody uses that text only format any more.

     

    One can buy such crackers for little. Most libraries who do DRM have and use these crackers. One of the reasons that not all of the tablets do FB standard is that it is a true/good DRM, and they do not want that. :grinning-smiley-044: .

     

    What is to keep you from simply cracking them for your use?

     

    (I am wondering just what percentage of the 'freebies' are not cracked DRM.)

     

    Ah well.

     

    Sarah

    of the Librum.

  13. Jeepers,

     

    ???

     

    You have me confused. Of course you can get kindle at your library.

     

    BUT! There should be no reason to make trips to your brick-and-mortar public / semi-private library.

     

    All libraries have electronic portals. Well, OK, any library who is part of any inter-library loan program. It is a requirement. They may not be publicly visible, but they must have them.

     

    I process such ILL requests weekly, usually to/from the LOC. Usually, they are in PDF, LOCER, or FB formats. Usually, these are processed (transcribed/converted) by the library and then delivered to you.

     

    But we do not 'kindle'. Sorry. I know there are conversion systems out there, but such is beyond our modest budget. We have to be selective. If I should have such a request, and I never have, I would refer it to our county library, they can do that. They would return the record, via portal, and I would then deliver it to the Patron.

     

    The content on *publicly viewable* librum.us site is all almost all FB format student projects where they learn to make such. ICSArchive.org is almost all PDF, many are also student projects, especially the ICS materials. If one of our sponsors provided us with a good conversion package, then we could do that too. Frankly, though I do not see a need, as I understand all those tablet thingies can take PDF, and many FB. Correct me if I am wrong here.

     

    Sarah

    of the Librum

     

    Sorry. ILL: InterLibrary Loan. LOC: Library of Congress. LOCER: Library of Congress Electronic Record (ancestor of PDF). FB: Flip Book (decendent of LOCER).

  14. Violet,

     

    Um, you can use it for making syrups, but I never have. I use mine for canning/jarring. You can use one for any liquid you want to extract water from, without scorching it. As a girl, mother used one to condense milk or soups, without scorching. She also used it to kill live cultures in what you would call soft yogurts or cheeses.

     

    Another use is to 'boat' food. A 'boat' is a unglazed ceramic pan. This boat floats in the vacuum pan, with the food it in. It will positively kill any unwanteds in the food. My youngest loves to put a fish fillet in a pat of butter in the boat. If a food is questionable or suspected to be turning, it could be used to salvage the food, but this practice is now forbidden, especially with fish/meat.

     

    I am in Virginia, in an old order Mennonite community, but came here from Iowa. You will find 'communities' often have them as a community property, especially with our Amish brethren. Ours has two, counting mine, which I always bring when we have a canning/jarring marathon amoung the goodwives. I was just fortunate to inherit this one.

     

    As to the whole pot pressure test, a portable pressure tank is filled at a compressor to a specific psi. This tank has a hose, with a fitting on the end that attaches/clamps on the nipple. Then they open the valve, with a long stick, If it takes the pressure in the tank it passes.

     

    Sarah

    of the Librum

  15. Violet, we are mixing equipment.

     

    My badly expressed point is that a 'vacuum pan' (misnomer!) can be used as a pressure cooker, in a heavy duty industrial sense. I conceed that they are really intended for different uses. But if you can get one... 'Steam King' is the brand name on mine, early fifties.

     

    Not to fight with you, but I wonder if you know what an autoclave is. An autoclave pumps/evacs out the air first... It works a vacuum, not with pressure. Not fighting! :bouquet:

     

    I do find it interesting that you do not test the whole pan. Here they do as you do with the hand pump, but then they also do a heavy psi test, whole pot, to test the seal. I have seen one with a 'blown' seal. I do not recall that brand, but It was an old hand-me-down model.

     

    Ah well.

     

    Sarah

    of the Librum

  16. Thanks, Mommato3boys.

     

    Arby, I would not know, I just remember her stories from when I lived with them. They took me in after losing my first husband. And I met #2 in her kitchen. Her 'pub', as I recall, was the 'Green Man' in High Wycombe. (I know how to spell that one, as I have a stein from there!)

     

    I know Guiness is England English. I've never had any. The local stout, frankly, you can have.

     

    I am not worried about meat around here. In that way I am fortunate.

     

    Sarah

    of the Librum

  17. Oh, 'bangers' !!!

     

    WWII bread sausages. They used whatever grain mush they could get, a sliver of fat or grease for some flavor, and packed it into a linen sausage skin to cook.

     

    The late goodwife Lee showed me these. She learned of them when her husband introduced her, when he was posted to England, and she had just arrived.. He had a strange sense of humor. According to her story, after she 'blahed' the banger, she was treated to a large shepards pie by the establishment. She said it was worth it. She loved the 'Strongbow', a hard English apple cider, CO2 carbinated, as she did not care for flat heavy beers.

     

    There was a bottle of oatmeal 'stout' on a 'shelf of honor' in her kitchen. I inherited some of the English steins she had.

     

    If it were me, I would also research the spices used for haggis. Haggis, if you did not know, is oatmeal and spices, cooked in a sheep stomach.

     

    BTW: There is an actual measurement for a 'dash'. A 'pinch' too. The lady in the video apparently did not know that.

     

    AND you can do oatmeal like corn, like 'corn dodgers', aka 'hush puppies'.

     

    Sarah

    of the Librum

  18. ScrubbieLady is right on this one. Our extension office uses a clamp on guage to test. But leave the whole pressure cooker with them. That way you also get a test of the lid seal.

     

    And you did right to have it checked/repaired by the manufacturer. There are kits to do the repair, but pressure testing is something I do not like dealing with.

     

    Tip: 'Vacuum pans', or 'evaporation pans' or 'condenser pans', are pressure cookers, but with a higher possible pressure. If you find one at an estate sale or the like, they can vary the pressure better, by a dial, not by rocker weights. Mine will do sixty psi. This is the old school way to make condensed soups for canning.

     

    Sarah

    of the Librum

  19. LOL, be careful of microwaving books, glue is flammable and will catch on fire if it gets hot enough! Someone above said they do that!

     

    Thank you for beating me to it.

     

    Freezing is not that effective, and also hurts the 'trade' (glueback)(thermal glue) paperbacks.

     

    On that note, if you do damage a trade paperback with cold, Brodart Plastic glue, about $5 a squeeze bottle, is the trick. Posted by request, as someone broke some spines by freezing.

     

    Oh, and most 'foggers' are ineffective.

     

    Sarah

    of the Librum.

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using this site, you agree to our Terms of Use.